Re: Don't cvs update now, if ...

At 20:57 10.10.02 -0400, Levi Bard wrote:
Sorry for the incovenience. The M$ compiler docs claim this construct to
be correct (there is no warning at all for the redefinition and at least
for C++ this is standard conform :) See :

For ANSI C, declarator identifiers have to be unique (see K&R 2.ed p216 and
219).  So it's a no-no.

Incidentally, why are we referring to the Microsoft compiler docs as
evidence of the standard?

I'm not sure why _you_ are referring to th M$ compiler but I was 
referring to it because it simply was the compiler causing 
the inconvenience.
And I was not referring to it as the (or even a) standard. The only 
standard I was referring to was the C++ one which definitely isn't 
from Micro$oft but isn't simply linkable either, cause you have to 
pay to read it.
In case you haven't noticed yet, most work for Dia on win32 is done
with the M$ compiler ...


-------- Hans "at" Breuer "dot" Org -----------
Tell me what you need, and I'll tell you how to 
get along without it.                -- Dilbert

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]