Re: Don't cvs update now, if ...
- From: Hans Breuer <hans breuer org>
- To: dia-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Don't cvs update now, if ...
- Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 19:45:11 +0200
At 20:57 10.10.02 -0400, Levi Bard wrote:
Sorry for the incovenience. The M$ compiler docs claim this construct to
be correct (there is no warning at all for the redefinition and at least
for C++ this is standard conform :) See :
For ANSI C, declarator identifiers have to be unique (see K&R 2.ed p216 and
219). So it's a no-no.
Incidentally, why are we referring to the Microsoft compiler docs as
evidence of the standard?
I'm not sure why _you_ are referring to th M$ compiler but I was
referring to it because it simply was the compiler causing
And I was not referring to it as the (or even a) standard. The only
standard I was referring to was the C++ one which definitely isn't
from Micro$oft but isn't simply linkable either, cause you have to
pay to read it.
In case you haven't noticed yet, most work for Dia on win32 is done
with the M$ compiler ...
-------- Hans "at" Breuer "dot" Org -----------
Tell me what you need, and I'll tell you how to
get along without it. -- Dilbert
] [Thread Prev