Re: Another XSLT Plugin / Makefile problem?

[Lars Clausen <lrclause cs uiuc edu>]

On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
> Le Thu, Jun 27, 2002, à 12:10:35PM +0100, Andrew Ferrier a écrit:
>
> > OK. Have to admit I was being a bit selfish in that I have yet
> > to run 'make dist' successfully --- just wanted to see what it
> > did! Maybe I should figure out how to check out 0.90 Gold from
> > anon. CVS...
>
> Something like
>       cvs co -r DIA_0_90 dia  
>
> > That said, yes, if nobody ever runs it, problems won't get
> > noticed...
>
> That's very true. It is valuable to know that there are "make dist"
> problems; however, it is important as well to know that the problem is in
> the dist part of the makefiles, as opposed to the simple "build" part.
>
> I noticed mat's comment on automake1.5; also, I noticed that sid includes
> automake1.5 and automake 1.6. 
>
> Lars: we have to decide something:
>       - we figure out how the old app/Makefile.am did to have a
>       conditional gnome-print renderer without tripping up "make dist"

This is what we want.  AFAIR, we need to define XSLT_LIBS, XSLT_PLUGIN etc
depending on the --enable. 

>       or
>
>       - we include libxslt unconditionally

Not good.  We would at least want to stabilize the plugin and see if it's
something that many people want.  

>       or 
>       
>       - we mandate automake 1.5 or more.

Not until those 'issues' are sorted out.

Funny thing is, I got that error message on both my machines when the XSLT
plugin arrived without using make dist, but I just did a second make and it
was happy.  I am using automake 1.4.

-Lars


-- 
Lars Clausen (http://shasta.cs.uiuc.edu/~lrclause)| Hårdgrim of Numenor
"I do not agree with a word that you say, but I   |----------------------------
will defend to the death your right to say it."   | Where are we going, and
    --Evelyn Beatrice Hall paraphrasing Voltaire  | what's with the handbasket?