Re: Proposal: Replace all references to master/slave in GNOME modules
- From: Pat Suwalski <pat suwalski net>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Proposal: Replace all references to master/slave in GNOME modules
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 10:22:55 -0400
On 2019-04-25 10:17 a.m., Christopher Davis via desktop-devel-list wrote:
That connection is the problematic bit, because in some countries slavery
wasn't all that long ago, and in some places it's never left or it
changed forms.
Doesn't change the fact that it's accurate, and is the correct computer
terminology.
If we want to be an inclusive project, it would be beneficial to use
language that do esn't scratch at scars
when we have other metaphors we can use.
I would suggest to you that trying to be "inclusive" turns a lot of
people off, making it overall less inclusive. ie, negative gains.
And I'm serious about that. If anything's been learned from the drama on
LKML last year, it's that for every one person "triggered" by status
quo, about three seemed "triggered" by forcing changes on that front.
--Pat
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]