Re: Proposal: Replace all references to master/slave in GNOME modules
- From: Daniel Mustieles García <daniel mustieles gmail com>
- To: Andre Klapper <ak-47 gmx net>
- Cc: Desktop Devel <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Proposal: Replace all references to master/slave in GNOME modules
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 10:59:51 +0200
Never mind André! Maybe in my previous mail I should have included the steps in the last one sent by me, to avoid confusions.
El jue., 25 abr. 2019 a las 10:54, Andre Klapper (<
ak-47 gmx net>) escribió:
One coffee later, I guess we discuss different things in this thread:
1) Whether to replace the "master/slave" terminology. I'm slightly in
favor if *both* terms are used in connection.
Terms like "blacklist" and "whitelist" are similar. They have a bad
connotation for some plus are harder to interpret than terms like
"blocklist" and "allowlist" which actually express what they do.
2) Whether to rename the git master branch ("master" having the meaning
of "original copy" as already pointed out) when there is no slave
branch. Which I'm not in favor.
Should have written that already in my previous email instead. Meh.
Sorry, Daniel.
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak-47 gmx net
https://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]