Re: GNOME Games source name

On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 15:53 +0200, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 03:10:59PM +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Yet this is what you're doing. If you want an application to be
renamed, you'd better make sure that you can actually come up with
good name, and argue why it is an insurmountable problem to call
package "gnome-games-app" or similar in your distribution.

gnome-games-center ? Like gnome-control-center.

Anyway, the plugins of gnome-games will maybe be tricky to package.
Isn't a Flatpak sufficient? The purpose of Flatpak is to avoid all
duplicated work of packaging in all the distros. I have always seen
as a big waste of time. For new apps, does it really make sense to
package them in the traditional manner?

Again, that's not relevant to the discussion about why the "gnome-
games" tarball name is a problem for distributions.

The flatpak name is "org.gnome.Games". I doubt it conflicts with

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]