Re: Maintainers, please read this. [Re: GNOME 3.19.2 unstable tarballs due]

[Carlos Soriano Sanchez <csoriano redhat com>]

Hi Frederic,

This is useful, thanks!

----- Original Message -----
| Hi,
| 
| Philip Withnall wrote:
| 
| > On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 11:07 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote:
| > > I'm a bit surprised by 1) but we could certainly automatically
| > > produce
| > > a list of maintainers / modules/ time/commits since last release, if
| > > that could be useful.
| > 
| > I think 1) would be useful because I have a load of modules which I am
| > not sure if they need to follow the main GNOME release schedule. I had
| > a nagging fear they should, but then nobody poked me about doing a
| > release, so I forgot to check up further. As a result, a lot of my
| > modules haven’t had releases following the schedule. (Sorry if I have
| > been a total pain because of this.)
| > 
| > Would such a list be useful for the release team, as a way of tracking
| > who needs nagging? If so, then I hope producing it should not be too
| > much of a drain on your time — if it is a drain, then you probably
| > shouldn’t do it.
| 
| This was mostly done manually (at least as far I am concerned), but
| here is an experiment,
|   https://people.gnome.org/~fpeters/health/wanted-releases.html
| 
| And the red modules are first targets.
| 
| (this has been generated from my local clones, updated a few hours
| ago, if it's something we want to pursue it would be quite nice to
| have this automated and running on GNOME infrastructure) (the disk
| requirements exclude openshift).
| 
| 
|         Fred
| 
| [code at https://git.gnome.org/browse/releng/tree/tools/health/]
| _______________________________________________
| desktop-devel-list mailing list
| desktop-devel-list gnome org
| https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list