Re: Again: please clarify the decision on IBus integration

On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Florian Müllner <fmuellner gnome org> wrote:
> On Jul 9, 2012 4:52 PM, "Rui Tiago Cação Matos" <tiagomatos gmail com>
> wrote:
>> If you start offloading keybindings and other
>> configurations then how do you make sure that the UI will be
>> consistent with the remaining GNOME UI?
> Particularly for keybindings it's not merely about UI consistency - parallel
> keybindings configuration means the responsibility for resolving conflicting
> settings is left entirely to users (and of course they'll need to figure out
> first that this is the reason for stuff not working as expected)
> Florian

I agree that keybinding is something annoying and needs to be solved,
but I've explained that this could be resolved in a better way, which
is much more reasonable. If we have the interface for IMF and DE to
talk with each other, then GNOME can just try to centralize the
configuration and try to solve conflicts - but if there is something
that IMF insist on keeping, then GNOME should give up. Just like when
you press SysRq+R then the kernel won't let GNOME to handle such a

Aron Xu

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]