Re: Module Proposal: Zeitgeist
- From: Seif Lotfy <seif lotfy com>
- To: Jeremy Bicha <jbicha ubuntu com>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Module Proposal: Zeitgeist
- Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 17:27:10 +0200
While this thread reflects a bit about some community observations on
how things are handled in GNOME, and i support such a discussion, I
find it a bit off-topic. Can we start a new thread discussing these
issues or so.
Let us stay on topic.
Can an applications use Zeitgeist for technical/optimization (NOT
FEATURES OR UX) causes? And how does it proceed?
1) Implement first and require dependency later.
2) Request blessed dependency and then implement, if the blessing is given.
I would like to know an answer from the release-team if possible,
since this is not really design related.
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Jeremy Bicha <jbicha ubuntu com> wrote:
> On 22 April 2012 06:14, Olav Vitters <olav vitters nl> wrote:
>> Risk for the feature focus is that the external dependencies "rules" are
>> forgotten. E.g. I noticed that gnome-boxes increased its libosinfo
>> version requirement in 3.4.1. That's not so nice when distribution is in
>> a version freeze.
> Off-topic, Ubuntu 12.04 won't have Boxes in the repositories, at least
> partly because the libvirt dependency was increased 2 weeks after The
> Freeze. But this was the first stable release of Boxes, I'm sure
> things will be better for 3.6.
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
] [Thread Prev