Re: GNOME Feature Proposal: Backup
- From: Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
- To: allanpday gmail com
- Cc: Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GNOME Feature Proposal: Backup
- Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 12:16:46 +0100
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 12:01 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
> Michael Terry wrote:
> > On 13 May 2011 12:28, Allan Day <allanpday gmail com> wrote:
> > > Would you be willing to use GNOME Bugzilla?
> >
> > That specifically would be the hardest part of an infrastructure move.
> > Some important downstreams (Ubuntu and flavors) and my sister project
> > Duplicity are all in LP. So it's very easy to share bugs and triaging
> > work there.
> >
> > Plus since I'm an Ubuntu developer in my day job, it's my normal workflow.
> >
> > So there's good technical collaboration reasons why I value LP for
> > bugs as well as the more squishy comfort reason.
>
> There are good reasons for wanting to have Deja Dup on GNOME Bugzilla, I
> think. I can imagine myself wanting to CC other GNOME contributors on
> Deja Dup bugs. I can also imagine bugs being punted between Deja Dup and
> other GNOME modules. Plus there's the whole release planning and GNOME
> QA effort to consider.
>
> Don't forget that there's a high chance that people will fix Deja Dup
> bugs for you if you're on GNOME Bugzilla. :)
And that's where the crashers for your control-center panel will end up
as well.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]