Re: Moduleset Reorganization -- Take two
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: Frederic Peters <fpeters gnome org>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Moduleset Reorganization -- Take two
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:43:31 +0100
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 10:03 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote:
> Murray Cumming wrote:
>
> > > > What is happening? Maintainers deserve to know.
> > >
> > > Taking just the bindings, for example, you seem to have done this
> > > without bothering to inform the affected maintainers
> > > - Dropped all bindings apart from C++ (gtkmm and co).
> > > - And volunteered gtkmm for slightly stronger API/ABI and
> > > release-frequency rules.
> >
> > Will the release-team please reply.
>
> Sorry this is something I have to do and have been to busy at work
> there last days. But to precisely answer your questions:
Thanks.
> - the bindings have not been dropped, there is C++, there is Python
> (which is now just pygobject + introspection), there is JS (twice),
> there is no C# (but http://live.gnome.org/GNOME+MonoHackfest2010
> has a plan), there is no Perl or Java, but they were not in the
> previous modulesets either
Yes, they were :http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentynine/Bindings
> (and not being in the jhbuild
> modulesets didn't mean not being released alongside GNOME, for the
> Perl bindings).http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentynine/Bindings
This reminds me. I really don't like that the current module lists seem
to be just links to the jhbuild XML files:
http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointNinetyone/#Release_Suites
The list should provide clarity to _humans_, so this isn't good enough.
Even without this vague reorganization, at the best of times, we have
enough confusion about what is in the official GNOME module sets.
> - there is no stronger API/ABI rules, but it's true we'd like to have
> gtkmm follow the schedule.
So, I'm free to do an ABI at gtkmm 3.2, for instance, as I was before?
You don't seem to link now to _any_ rules for _any_ module sets at the
moment, so you aren't communicating any guarantees to the world about
API/ABI. The internets can now make up any nonsense and nobody can point
them at the truth.
I am generally upset about the whole thing, because I helped make things
clearer when I was on the release-team.
--
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]