Re: Moduleset Reorganization -- Take two

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 15:52 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 13:53 +0100, Kenneth Nielsen wrote:
> > I'm interested to know what is going to happen about the module set
> > reorganization now. We had the second proposal presented, we had a
> > HUGE discussion about pros and cons with a lot of different views on
> > this. So now what?
> > 
> > - Will this be implemented?
> > - If so when?
> > - Or will there be another iteration with another proposal and discussion?
> [snip]
> 
> I am also very concerned that there has been no further announcement
> about this, and no response to the concerns raised, though the recent
> releases show at least some, though not all, of these changes.
> 
> What is happening? Maintainers deserve to know.

Taking just the bindings, for example, you seem to have done this
without bothering to inform the affected maintainers
- Dropped all bindings apart from C++ (gtkmm and co).
- And volunteered gtkmm for slightly stronger API/ABI and
release-frequency rules.


-- 
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com