Re: About gtk+-3.2 relying on pango-1.29

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Pacho Ramos
<pacho condmat1 ciencias uniovi es> wrote:
>> Its safe. 1.30 hasn't happened because pango is on minimal maintenance
>> at the moment.
> OK, I have seen there is a different branch than master called
> "pango-1-29-4", I guess then we should stick with pango-1.29.4 and not
> switch to 1.29.5 (that looks to come from master), no?

Yes, 1.29.5 comes from master

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]