Re: About gtk+-3.2 relying on pango-1.29

From: Matthias Clasen <matthias clasen gmail com>
To: pacho condmat1 ciencias uniovi es
Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
Subject: Re: About gtk+-3.2 relying on pango-1.29
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 06:50:05 -0500

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Pacho Ramos
<pacho condmat1 ciencias uniovi es> wrote:
> Hello
>
> I would like to confirm if it's safe (for "stable" usage) to rely on
> pango-1.29 for a stable version like gtk+-3.2. Is pango-1.29.4 stable
> enough? In that case, why it wasn't revbumped to 1.30?
>
> Thanks a lot for the info :-)

Its safe. 1.30 hasn't happened because pango is on minimal maintenance
at the moment.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: About gtk+-3.2 relying on pango-1.29
  - From: Pacho Ramos

References:
- About gtk+-3.2 relying on pango-1.29
  - From: Pacho Ramos

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]