Re: About gtk+-3.2 relying on pango-1.29

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Pacho Ramos
<pacho condmat1 ciencias uniovi es> wrote:
> Hello
> I would like to confirm if it's safe (for "stable" usage) to rely on
> pango-1.29 for a stable version like gtk+-3.2. Is pango-1.29.4 stable
> enough? In that case, why it wasn't revbumped to 1.30?
> Thanks a lot for the info :-)

Its safe. 1.30 hasn't happened because pango is on minimal maintenance
at the moment.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]