Re: About gtk+-3.2 relying on pango-1.29

El mar, 20-12-2011 a las 06:50 -0500, Matthias Clasen escribió:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Pacho Ramos
> <pacho condmat1 ciencias uniovi es> wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I would like to confirm if it's safe (for "stable" usage) to rely on
> > pango-1.29 for a stable version like gtk+-3.2. Is pango-1.29.4 stable
> > enough? In that case, why it wasn't revbumped to 1.30?
> >
> > Thanks a lot for the info :-)
> Its safe. 1.30 hasn't happened because pango is on minimal maintenance
> at the moment.

OK, I have seen there is a different branch than master called
"pango-1-29-4", I guess then we should stick with pango-1.29.4 and not
switch to 1.29.5 (that looks to come from master), no?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]