El mar, 20-12-2011 a las 06:50 -0500, Matthias Clasen escribió: > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Pacho Ramos > <pacho condmat1 ciencias uniovi es> wrote: > > Hello > > > > I would like to confirm if it's safe (for "stable" usage) to rely on > > pango-1.29 for a stable version like gtk+-3.2. Is pango-1.29.4 stable > > enough? In that case, why it wasn't revbumped to 1.30? > > > > Thanks a lot for the info :-) > > Its safe. 1.30 hasn't happened because pango is on minimal maintenance > at the moment. > OK, I have seen there is a different branch than master called "pango-1-29-4", I guess then we should stick with pango-1.29.4 and not switch to 1.29.5 (that looks to come from master), no? Thanks
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part