Re: GNOME user survey 2011
- From: Florian Max <florian muellner gmail com>
- To: Felipe Contreras <felipe contreras gmail com>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME user survey 2011
- Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 15:23:39 +0200
2011/8/1 Felipe Contreras <felipe contreras gmail com>
Indeed, which is why I say the question is not biased. Results can go
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Florian Müllner <fmuellner gnome org
> 2011/8/1 Felipe Contreras <felipe contreras gmail com
>> Yes, but if a significant percentage of the people answer "not at
>> all", or "somewhat", then the survey would be a bit wasted, since now
>> you have to wait another year to ask in more detail.
> Of course the same argument applies if a significant percentage of people
> feels that GNOME has "too few" configuration options.
one way or the other.
Huh? How does the fact that a request to "add more options" is meaningless without specifying which options are (supposedly) missing have anything to do with the original question being biased?
] [Thread Prev