Re: Modulesets Reorganization
- From: Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Modulesets Reorganization
- Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 10:22:28 +0200
Le mercredi 02 juin 2010, à 09:35 +0200, Simon van der Linden a écrit :
> On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 02:41 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > Le mardi 01 juin 2010, à 19:11 -0500, Shaun McCance a écrit :
> > > 2) Will the Applications be something official that you
> > > have to nominate modules for and follow certain rules
> > > like our release procedures? A big part of what makes
> > > applications in the desktop so great is that they work
> > > with our translation, documentation, and other teams
> > > within our schedule.
> >
> > At first, yes, it will be this way. It's the way we've been working for
> > years, so it's easier to do the first step with a process we know. That
> > being said, one rule that, imho, we should remove is that the
> > application is hosted on the GNOME infrastructure -- that's certainly a
> > challenge, especially for translations. But we can't expect to host the
> > whole world in our infrastructure :-)
>
> I think hosting the whole GNOME project on the same infrastructure has
> several advantages for the community: a single place to look for bugs,
> for code, for mailing lists, etc., and therefore fewer accounts to
> manage for everyone. It also ensures rather durable hosting (I have seen
> various projects moving as maintainers went in and out)...
That's true, and we should certainly recommend to use the GNOME
infrastructure. But it doesn't mean we should ignore everything else.
Which is my point here.
Vincent
--
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]