Re: (L)GPLv3

[Maciej Piechotka <uzytkownik2 gmail com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

On 09/07/10 16:37, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:
> I would strongly prefer glib to not change its license, we are keeping
> the lgplv2.1 in GStreamer, partly because a lot of people making
> products with GStreamer prefer it over lgplv3. If glib switched under us
> it would make our license stability a bit of a joke. If someone wants to
> use glib under the lgpl3 they can do so now with the current license, if
> upstream changes however, people can not keep using it under the
> lgplv2.1 without forking.
> 
> Christian
> 
Not quite true. You can link LGPL 2.1 project with LGPL 3.0 library
according to FSF.

IANAL but LGPL is not viral license and you can link anything with it.

Regards
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=apOq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----