Re: Module proposal: dconf
- From: Andre Klapper <ak-47 gmx net>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org, Ryan Lortie <desrt desrt ca>
- Subject: Re: Module proposal: dconf
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:24:51 +0100
Am Montag, den 12.10.2009, 11:27 -0400 schrieb Ryan Lortie:
> The main technical blocker on the inclusion of dconf is that it relies
> on a branch of glib that has not yet been merged to master. We have had
> a discussion at Boston Summit two days ago between myself, Matthias
> Clasen and David Zeuthen and we have agreed on the "way forward" for
> dealing with all of the GVariant/DBus related issues in GLib that
> involves the merging of the required patches to glib. Hopefully this
> happens in the coming weeks.
Currently the (challening) plan is to move completely from gconf to
dconf in the 2.31 cycle.
If I get it right (probably not, so feel free to correct me), this
requires GDbus, GVariant and GSettings to be included in a glib release
that should happen before GNOME 2.30 release in March.
According to http://live.gnome.org/GTK+/Roadmap both GDbus and GVariant
branches are currently awaiting a review. Also, there is a GSettings
branch at http://git.gnome.org/browse/glib/log/?h=gsettings but I don't
know its status.
Any updates?
Is it still realistic to get these requirements in very soon as a
preparation for the dconf move in 2.31? Or can we bury the dconf plan
for GNOME 3 because there's not much progress in glib?
andre
--
mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed
http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]