Re: External Dependency Proposal: libappindicator
- From: Cody Russell <bratsche gnome org>
- To: Christian Persch <chpe gnome org>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: External Dependency Proposal: libappindicator
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:18:10 -0600
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 14:16 +0100, Christian Persch wrote:
> Also, why is this LGPL 2&3-only instead of the usual LGPL
> 2.1-or-later?
Because seriously, everything should be this way. None of us should be
saying "LGPL 2.1 or later". Ask a lawyer, even one from the FSF, how
much sense it makes to license your software that way.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
