Re: Appearance properties
- From: Xavier Claessens <xclaesse gmail com>
- To: Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Appearance properties
- Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:08:39 +0100
Le mardi 10 novembre 2009 à 10:56 +0000, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
> On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 11:28 +0100, Xavier Claessens wrote:
> > Le mardi 10 novembre 2009 à 10:19 +0000, Thomas Wood a écrit :
> > > On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 10:18 +0100, Xavier Claessens wrote:
> > > > So if you agree/disagree with those changes, please tell your opinion!
> > > > I would like to know if I'm the only one to be worried.
> > >
> > > Well, I'll repeat what I said on the bug:
> > >
> > > I agree with McCann, if someone wants to tweak their settings in such a
> > > way, then it should be done through an appropriate "tweaks" application.
> > > The interface tab does not contain options that are of interest to the
> > > majority of users.
> >
> > Can you please tell me what's gnome-appearance-properties if it is not
> > to tweak the appearance of the GNOME desktop?
> >
> > The fact that those options are useless for the majority of users is
> > highly debatable and should definitely not depend on you+McCann alone. I
> > would like wider acceptance before.
> >
> > I definitely give a -1, but if I'm alone then ignore me ;)
>
> You're confusing this place for a democracy :)
>
> We might as well enable Bugzilla voting otherwise.
>
> The reasons behind the move have been documented, and explanations given
> on how to get the icons back.
Actually I started this thread because starting from today, GNOME does
not have any way to get icons back anymore. gconf-editor is not
considered a "tweak application" ;-)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]