Re: bug-buddy integration
- From: Andre Klapper <ak-47 gmx net>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: bug-buddy integration
- Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 22:33:16 +0100
Am Freitag, den 13.03.2009, 15:13 -0600 schrieb Federico Mena Quintero:
> Currently, bug-buddy doesn't send a stack trace
Why do you assume bug-buddy does not send a stacktrace?
My bug-buddy did send a stacktrace a few days ago, otherwise I wouldn't
have been able to submit gnome bug 575009.
> In such bug reports, you must always ask the submitter, "please
> get a stack trace" with all the trouble that explaining that entails.
A stock answer linking to http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces explaining
everything(tm) is just one click away. If that wikipage is unclear
everyone is invited to edit/improve it.
> In the new bug-buddy, the default is "it doesn't work".
I can't second this.
In fact the "new" (whatever that means) bug-buddy has reduced bugsquad
workload by e.g. rejecting many useless traces already before they get
submitted to gnome bugzilla.
andre
--
mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed
http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]