Re: GNOME 2.26 Showstopper Review

[Andre Klapper <ak-47 gmx net>]

Am Dienstag, den 24.02.2009, 15:47 +0100 schrieb Vincent Untz:
> Le mardi 24 février 2009, à 14:35 +0000, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro a écrit :
> > Does GnomePrint no longer belong in the GNOME Desktop platform?  

http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyfive/Desktop#upcoming_deprecations

> We've been trying to remove libgnomeprint* for quite some time now.
> Tomboy has been ported this cycle, so the bindings are the last steps, I
> believe.

To be exact: gnome-python-desktop and gnome-games (the latter to be
ported for 2.27.1, see
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=564655 ).

> > Does GnomeVFS no longer belong in the GNOME Developer platform? 

http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyfive/Platform#upcoming_deprecations

> > In case of Yes, would it be OK to keep the Python bindings where they
> > are and just mark them as deprecated?  Else they'd have to move into
> > gnome-python-extras, I guess...
> 
> For gnome-vfs, marking the bindings as deprecated makes sense, since
> gnome-vfs is still part of the platform at the moment.

The only modules still requiring gnome-vfs are:
      * dasher: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=572134
      * gnome-mag through its libcolorblind dependency
      * gnome-python
      * gnome-utils: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=543713
      * probably some other deprecated modules like libgnome/ui

That's all, and I hope gnome-vfs will die for 2.27.1, too.

andre
-- 
 mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed
 http://www.iomc.de/  | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper