Re: New module proposal: tracker

[Lennart Poettering <mztabzr 0pointer de>]

On Tue, 18.08.09 15:15, Jamie McCracken (jamie mccrack googlemail com) wrote:

> > I should also add, inotify is not the ONLY technology which we have been 
> > discussing, setrlimit() is another and I could probably list a few 
> > others which we have been talking about with kernel developers.
> 
> I would prefer if we avoid relying on kernel and inotify anyway (it will
> never work on NFS in any event). We certainly dont want trackers
> progress held up by kernel slackage

kernel slackage?

hehe. No disrespect but I am pretty sure that the kernel still gets at
least a 100 times more commits per month than tracker does?

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering                        Red Hat, Inc.
lennart [at] poettering [dot] net
http://0pointer.net/lennart/           GnuPG 0x1A015CC4