Re: New module proposal: tracker

On Tue, 18.08.09 15:15, Jamie McCracken (jamie mccrack googlemail com) wrote:

> > I should also add, inotify is not the ONLY technology which we have been 
> > discussing, setrlimit() is another and I could probably list a few 
> > others which we have been talking about with kernel developers.
> I would prefer if we avoid relying on kernel and inotify anyway (it will
> never work on NFS in any event). We certainly dont want trackers
> progress held up by kernel slackage

kernel slackage?

hehe. No disrespect but I am pretty sure that the kernel still gets at
least a 100 times more commits per month than tracker does?


Lennart Poettering                        Red Hat, Inc.
lennart [at] poettering [dot] net           GnuPG 0x1A015CC4

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]