Re: mailto: now all of a sudden necessary in DOAP file

On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 00:58, Philip Withnall <philip tecnocode co uk> wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 17:08 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
>> On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 23:58 +0200, Ruben Vermeersch wrote:
>> > On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 15:46 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
>> > > Any rdf:resource should always be a URL.  An email address
>> > > is not a URL.  The correct thing to do is to use a mailto:
>> > > URL.
>> > >
>> > > The fact that Pulse didn't have mailto: in its templates
>> > > and that we put bogus info on just shows
>> > > that we messed up.
>> > >
>> > > Sorry for the confusion.
>> >
>> > Does this mean we should all update our doap files?
>> That would be preferable.  At the moment it's not
>> breaking anything that I know of.  For our internal
>> tools, we can account for this hiccup.  But if other
>> parts of the world consume these files, they might
>> not understand it.
> Let's not put hacks in our tools barely a week after they're first
> introduced, please?
Is it possible to put something in the pre-commit script that checks
the doap file whenever there is a push to and gives a
warning when the doap file is not correct. Currently it only checks
commits of a doap file. What I'm proposing is to do it for all
commits. Otherwise existing incorrect doap files probably won't get


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]