Re: Module proposal: Empathy for GNOME 2.24
- From: Martyn Russell <martyn imendio com>
- To: Patryk Zawadzki <patrys pld-linux org>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Module proposal: Empathy for GNOME 2.24
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:37:18 +0000
Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Martyn Russell <martyn imendio com> wrote:
>> Currently there are 22 files which either have or should have my/Gossip
>> copyright information in libempathy alone. There are 43 source files. So
>> half of libempathy is not copyright to you to re-license.
Actually, I recounted the files and "22" is slightly incorrect since I
included ALL the files missing licensing information.
> So you are basically saying "I'm -1 because of relicensing problems
> that I'm causing myself?"
Yes, effectively.
As for "relicensing problems that I'm causing myself", I am FULLY at
liberty to do this. It is/was my free time, my decision to use this
license and my decision to maintain this license for *my contributions*.
It is not ultimately down to just me either, I did not write this
project completely on my own remember.
I am merely pointing out where licensing is currently incorrectly stated
(which others asked for in this thread) and also that the problem is not
JUST about relicensing libempathy-gtk, but also libempathy.
> Please point the rest of us to the
> discussion where Imendio/Gossip staff gives their reasons against
> LGPL.
Google is your friend :)
This was partly discussed on IRC with Xavier IIRC and also covered here:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2007-September/msg00554.html
--
Regards,
Martyn
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]