Re: New module decisions for 2.22

Am Mittwoch, den 09.01.2008, 18:10 -0700 schrieb Elijah Newren:
> On Jan 9, 2008 5:51 PM, David Zeuthen <david fubar dk> wrote:
> > > >   PolicyKit & PolicyKit-gnome (external dependency)
> >
> > several members of the release team pointed out to me that it was
> just an external dependency and thus didn't need to be proposed.
> Blessed as far as gnome releases goes means allowed as a hard
> dependency for modules.  PK and PK-gnome are not blessed external
> dependencies because you said that no hard dependencies were needed at
> this time.
> (I'd give my +1 for blessing them now if we need it, it just was
> assumed that we didn't need to discuss it.)

i can only mention for another time that policykit-gnome currently has a
hard dependency on libsexy[1].
for several times in the past, the release-team has proposed to
integrate libsexy in an already existing library like GTK+, and it was
mentioned again in vuntz' original module decisions email. so i will
not bless it.
an optional dependency of policykit-gnome on libsexy should not be a


 mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed  |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]