Am Dienstag, den 12.02.2008, 19:58 +0200 schrieb Kalle Vahlman: > I suggest people either convert to "doing the ports" camp (yes I'm > looking at the list[1] for something within my power to port), to > "testing the ports" camp or at least stop acting like gio already > didn't make it. just to avoid misunderstandings, because your link for [1] was missing: we don't need to port as many modules as possible from gnome-vfs to gio for 2.22 (that would be http://live.gnome.org/GioPort ), that's not what is critical. what we must do is shrinking the todo list at http://live.gnome.org/GioToDo and fix the reported bugs in bugzilla, see http://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?product=glib&component=gio&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=NEEDINFO and http://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?product=nautilus&component=GIO&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=NEEDINFO thanks for helping, andre -- mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil