Re: State of gvfs in Gnome 2.21

On Feb 12, 2008 9:24 AM, Olav Vitters <olav bkor dhs org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:13:45PM +0200, Lucas Rocha wrote:
> > I agree. We shouldn'd discard the possibility of either postponing the
> > gvfs-based Nautilus or delaying the .0 release if needed. Obviously,
> > releasing Nautilus with too many or some big regressions is not a good
> > plan.
> More for release-team to decide, not d-d-l. Devs should code.

Bzzt. Also wrong answer. r-t's role is in large part to reflect the
will of devs, so devs should definitely be discussing how to
prioritize and deal with this problem.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]