Re: libcanberra as an external dependency



On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Lennart Poettering <mztabzr 0pointer de> wrote:
> I'm note sure what the exact policy on what a blessed GNOME dependency
> can be is. But somehow I am pretty sure that the requirement that an
> (optional) dependency of a blessed dependency must also be blessed is
> NOT part of the policy.

<sarcasm>glibc is not a blessed dependency. Neither is any other libc
implementation.</sarcasm>

-- 
Patryk Zawadzki


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]