Re: DBus GLib API



On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 15:52 +0000, Rob Taylor wrote:
> Can anyone with a bit more library maintenance experience give me some
> advice on the best way forward? I don't want to just ignore the ABI
> issue, given the rapidly growing number of components depending on
> dbus-glib. Is the best thing to try and maintain ABI going forwards and
> deprecating symbols as needed? I'll also take a look at the main library
> users, if they're just using the mainloop integration perhaps
> Alexander's suggestion of splitting off a static library with just the
> mainloop integration would be a sensible option.

Note that such a static library would have to be built with -fPIC so
that shared libs can link to it.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Alexander Larsson                                            Red Hat, Inc 
                   alexl redhat com    alla lysator liu se 
He's an immortal guitar-strumming photographer fleeing from a secret 
government programme. She's a radical French-Canadian traffic cop with her own 
daytime radio talk show. They fight crime! 




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]