Re: Proposal for LAT inclusion in GNOME 2.18
- From: "Sven Herzberg" <herzi gnome-de org>
- To: lorenb mmgsecurity com
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Proposal for LAT inclusion in GNOME 2.18
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 22:56:16 +0200
Loren Bandiera schrieb:
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 21:04 +0200, Sven Herzberg wrote:
FUD, FUD, FUD. Do really want to argue on that level? GQ is a GTK+ 2
application for more than 3 years now.
Argue about what? I haven't used GQ in a long time, I never claimed to
be an expert on it. I merely offered my opinion.
Well, either providing wrong "facts" or absolutely outdated information
doesn't make your argumentation well-founded.
Just because I don't follow your project doesn't mean I'm trying to
spread FUD.
But as I don't follow yours either I have one question: to me your
application doesn't look like a "General LDAP client" but an "User
Management based on an LDAP Directory", it that impression right or does it
serve a general purpose (eg. administrating web server settings, mail
accounts, computer configurations, setting installed software on computers)?
If not, why not just create the proper backend for the Gnome System Tools
user management tool?
(I think you get the difference between "I claim GQ is GTK+ 1" and "Does LAT
provide more than...")
I don't have anything against your project.
I didn't claim that. I just claimed that you were spreading lies (though I
know now, that it was not your intention).
Regards,
Sven
--
Sven Herzberg <herzi gnome-de org>
GNOME Deutschland <http://www.gnome-de.org>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]