Re: Metacity Compositor
- From: JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
- To: Rob Adams <readams readams net>
- Cc: Kristian Høgsberg <krh bitplanet net>, Dan Winship <danw novell com>, David Reveman <davidr novell com>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Metacity Compositor
- Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 19:20:22 -0400
On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 14:34 -0700, Rob Adams wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 17:25 -0400, Kristian H�rg wrote:
> > It would be nice if you could back up these claims with examples of
> > such missing details. Or even better, file bugs so we can get them
> > fixed. There is a component for compiz in the freedesktop.org
> > bugzilla:
> >
> > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=xorg&component=App/compiz
>
> Why bother when both the GNOME and KDE projects already have excellent
> window managers? I don't understand this idea of writing a whole new
> window manager just to add eye candy. There's nothing about compositing
> that requires a complete rewrite of the window manager. The effort
> would be far better spend simply extending the existing support for
> compositors in metacity and KWin. Realistically, compiz is unlikely
> ever to be accepted by either project, because it's a chimera. So why
> are we dumping so much effort into it?
In fact David R. tried the compositing in metacity approach and ran into
technical difficulties (and in fact I believe that Kristian and Soeren
eventually bumped into the same limitations).
-JP
--
JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
Novell, Inc.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]