Re: Buildability of tarballs and cvs
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: Elijah Newren <newren gmail com>
- Cc: Gnome Desktop Development List <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Buildability of tarballs and cvs
- Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 20:28:20 +0200
On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 11:35 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
> On 6/18/06, Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org> wrote:
> > Yes - shipping build fix patches is a *massive* regression in the release
> > management process, cf. signature.
> <snip>
> > "Basically my philosophy on release management is that it should be
> > like police brutality." - Maciej Stachowiak
>
> Well, we'll have to switch back to police brutality then. :-) Time
> for some beatings...the following issues are still relevant AFAICT:
For really simple things, I think the release-team should just go ahead
and fix it, and retarball where necessary, if you can't get a maintainer
to do it.
(Please, would the release team finally just go ahead and release a
libglade 2.6.0 tarball?)
--
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]