Re: Mono/GTK#/Tomboy
- From: JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
- To: Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Mono/GTK#/Tomboy
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 12:23:43 -0400
On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 17:30 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le lundi 17 juillet 2006, �0:12, JP Rosevear a �it :
> > On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 09:58 +0200, Jan de Groot wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 08:32 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > > > And while there were almost no objections to Python, there are clearly
> > > > many objections to Mono.
> > >
> > > I used to have objections against the python bindings, but after those
> > > got splitup in pygtk, gnome-python, gnome-python-desktop and
> > > gnome-python-extras, I don't have big problems with it.
> > >
> > > Looking at mono, all of these bindings are in one package: gtk-sharp-2.
> > > I think, to get mono as accepted binding language, we should have a
> > > splitup similiar to the splitup that has been done to the python
> > > bindings.
> >
> > This is really just a packaging issue, on opensuse/SLED they are all
> > individual packages (glib-sharp, gtk-sharp, etc).
>
> How do we deal with the tarballs on the ftp servers? (there's no
> packages there). We only want the supported bindings in
> http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/bindings/2.x/2.x.y/sources/
I'm not sure where you're going, everything in gtk# should be supported,
or is there something you think isn't?
-JP
--
JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
Novell, Inc.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]