Re: GNOME Icon Theme 2.13.5[.1] AKA the HOLY CRAP, ICONS! release
- From: Luca Ferretti <elle uca libero it>
- To: Matthias Clasen <matthias clasen gmail com>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME Icon Theme 2.13.5[.1] AKA the HOLY CRAP, ICONS! release
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 18:43:45 +0100
Il giorno mar, 17/01/2006 alle 23.23 -0500, Matthias Clasen ha scritto:
> > >
> > > Perhaps this is a packaging issue? It certainly doesn't depend on that
> > > module here [1], or any machine I've ever installed it on before. And
> > > according to the source listing on cpan.org, it seems to only require
> > > XML::SAX or XML::Parser, which then also depend on other things, such as
> > > Storable, or dependencies provided by the perl source itself.
> > >
> > > -- dobey
> > >
> > > [1] perl-XML-Simple 2.14 on unstable SUSE/Novell packages
> > >
> >
> > Could be, all I can see in the Fedora Extras rpm changelog is
> >
> > - optional test module as build requirement perl(Tie::IxHash).
> >
> > I can probably just remove that build requirement, thanks for pointing that out.
> >
>
> Ok, to finish this particular discussion, I have gotten
> icon-naming-utils and its dependencies in Fedora Core now. To start a
> new one:
>
> 2006-01-17 Jakub Steiner <jimmac ximian com>
>
> * 16x16/places/folder-remote
> * 16x16/places/folder
> * 16x16/places/network-server
> * 16x16/places/network-workgroup
> * 16x16/places/user-desktop
> * 16x16/places/user-home
> * 16x16/places/user-trash
> * 16x16/status/user-trash-full: follow tango style guidelines more
> closely
>
> Are we silently switching to Tango here ?
Take a look here -> http://jimmac.musichall.cz/i.php?i=git2
The only differences with current GNOME icon style should be
* not black but simple darker outline
* more vibrant colors
* use a metaphor/appearance closer to Tango stuff
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]