Re: Mono bindings a blessed dependency? [Was: Tomboy in 2.16]
- From: Calum Benson <Calum Benson Sun COM>
- To: GNOME Desktop Developers Mailing List <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Mono bindings a blessed dependency? [Was: Tomboy in 2.16]
- Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 12:08:10 +0100
On 21 Apr 2006, at 08:22, Steve Frécinaux wrote:
Jamie McCracken wrote:
But lets be honest here. This discussion isn't about tomboy. We need
built in search; we're getting some of our best reviews in ages
because of our (currently optional) built in search:
well there's a huge problem with that - the memory usage of beagle
would mean only high end machines would be able to run it. Tracker
gives us a better alternative IMHO for integrated search as it
rocks for *everyone* and not just the few.
I agree with it. I haven't tested tracker, but beagle is just not
usable here (not enough memory, etc.).
FWIW, beagle also brings my 1.5GHz, 1Gb PowerBook G4 to its knees on
a regular basis :/
Cheeri,
Calum.
--
CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems Ireland
mailto:calum benson sun com Java Desktop System Team
http://blogs.sun.com/calum +353 1 819 9771
Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]