Re: Gnome 2 infinity and beyond [was Re: Tango and 2.16]
- From: "Elijah Newren" <newren gmail com>
- To: "Dan Winship" <danw novell com>
- Cc: Alan Horkan <horkana maths tcd ie>, Andrew Sobala <aes gnome org>, desktop-devel-list <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Gnome 2 infinity and beyond [was Re: Tango and 2.16]
- Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 12:02:43 -0600
On 4/20/06, Dan Winship <danw novell com> wrote:
<snip many arguments that make a lot of sense to me>
> So how about we pull a Solaris and call this fall's release "GNOME 16", next
> spring's "GNOME 18", etc?
Because if we're going to change the versioning, we should fix the
spelling at the same time. So it'd be "Gnome 16" and "Gnome 18". ;-)
I kind of like the idea of referring to the minor and micro version
number of Gnome as its version number. The 2 is understood (by the
developers) and people tend to call e.g. "2.14" a major release
anyway, so we might as well call our next version "Gnome 16"
publically. But, I doubt most would agree...
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]