Le mercredi 26 octobre 2005 à 18:32 +0200, Thomas Vander Stichele a écrit : > Hi, > > > > > That excludes lots of users, me being the first. > > > > I'm sad to here it. Fully understood : you don't care about many of us > > (users. You don't mind ruining everyone else improvements. You're right, > > time is not to improvements, please everyone unsuscribe > > performance-list. > > You are overreacting a little. Raphael is making the point that this is > optional - if you don't add the appet to your panel, you won't incur the > memory loss. So how would he be ruining other people's improvements ? Of course i'm overreacting. I'm quotting Davyd : "Inclusion into Desktop should not be a sign of any particular standard or quality, but simply that it is a critical piece of software that a desktop should not be without." > Settle down - you're being too antagonistic about this and it's making > the discussion go nowhere. then don't tell me the discussion about VM-based languages is over. I started answering this thread with real statistics about memory usage. I then said i don't think deskbar-applet will one day take less than 20MB or resident memory. So my real point is : __I__ think 22MB of memory usage for a single applet (applet according Davyd's definition) is unaffortable. No applet should take more than 10MB (shared and non-shared). I'm running 10 applets, how could i run 10 applets each taking 22MB ? -- Je cherche un emploi de développeur / admin sys&réseau sous GNU/Linux http://fr.lolix.org/search/cv/cv.php3?id=7101 http://dejean.benoit.free.fr/CV.pdf %% JID: TazForEver jabber org GNOME http://www.gnomefr.org/ LibGTop http://directory.fsf.org/libgtop.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part