Re: Clearlooks and GNOME 2.12
- From: Shaun McCance <shaunm gmail com>
- To: Richard Stellingwerff <remenic gmail com>
- Cc: Thomas Wood <thos gnome org>, desktop-devel-list gnome org, James Henstridge <james jamesh id au>
- Subject: Re: Clearlooks and GNOME 2.12
- Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 12:22:41 -0500
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 19:11 +0200, Richard Stellingwerff wrote:
> On 7/22/05, Steven Garrity <stevelist silverorange com> wrote:
> > Shaun McCance wrote:
> > > 3) My theme is like the default Clearlooks theme, but it has a
> > > more vibrant selection color. Most people seem to like that
> > > modification. It makes things look less washed out, without
> > > being obnoxiously bright. I was actually originally pushing
> > > the DeepSky variant, but more recent Clearlooks seem to have
> > > made it use brighter background colors. If we just depend on
> > > Clearlooks, we have to decide what to do with this.
> > I think this more vibrant color could probably be adopted as the default
> > by the clearlooks developer. I'd suggest going that way anyhow (sound
> > ok, Remenic?)
> Yes, this sounds good to me. I just have one little question for
> Shaun. ClearlooksBlue does not have the inset look on buttons, was
> this on purpose?
> If you're not sure what the difference is, see
> http://www.stellingwerff.com/blue1.png (normal) vs
> http://www.stellingwerff.com/blue2.png (inset). The difference is very
> minimal, but I do feel that the inset adds something.
I don't recall changing that. I just took the Clearlooks gtkrc
file and modified the selection color. If people want the inset
turned on, then we can turn it on.
] [Thread Prev