Re: Clearlooks and GNOME 2.12
- From: Shaun McCance <shaunm gmail com>
- To: Richard Stellingwerff <remenic gmail com>
- Cc: Thomas Wood <thos gnome org>, James Henstridge <james jamesh id au>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Clearlooks and GNOME 2.12
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 19:13:49 -0500
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 00:18 +0200, Richard Stellingwerff wrote:
> On 7/21/05, Shaun McCance <shaunm gmail com> wrote:
> > 1) My gnome-themes patch actually requires a newer version of
> > Clearlooks than what's in gtk-engines. Either we need to update
> > the version in gtk-engines, or we need to depend on Clearlooks
> > and remove the engine from gtk-engines.
>
> This will be done.
>
> > 5) If we're going to depend on Clearlooks, is there any chance
> > we could get it hosted on our CVS server, using our bugzilla,
> > and making releases on our FTP servers? I think it would make
> > things more pleasant for everybody.
>
> I'm waiting for a CVS account (request pending). As soon as I get it,
> I will move development into gtk-engines.
Rocking. So what about all the themes, like the Metacity theme and
the various Clearlooks GTK+ themes? If you're going to maintain the
engine in gtk-engines, then I suppose at least some of those should
be maintained in gnome-themes.
I just spoke with Havoc on IRC, and he doesn't think it's a problem
to have Metacity's schema file use Clearlooks as a default, even
though Clearlooks would be shipped in another tarball. So that's
one technical hurdle we don't have to worry about.
Can we have this all solved by this weekend?
--
Shaun
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]