Re: make distcheck in tinderbox [was Re: make check failures- gnome-vfs, e-d-s, at-spi]

[Ikke <eikke eikke com>]

On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 15:29 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> One way to go about is to require all involved modules to have an
> RPM .spec file, and jhbuild can be instructed to build and
> install RPMs, but most probably this will not be accepted
> practice in GNOME.  Or am I wrong?
Seriously, then I want ebuilds provided for every package too.

Nah, just kidding. Personally I don't think this is a good idea, as it
would give one distribution a "higher" state than others, which is not
what we want (I guess?)

Ikke