Re: make distcheck in tinderbox [was Re: make check failures- gnome-vfs, e-d-s, at-spi]

On 7/18/05, Ikke <eikke eikke com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 15:29 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> > One way to go about is to require all involved modules to have an
> > RPM .spec file, and jhbuild can be instructed to build and
> > install RPMs, but most probably this will not be accepted
> > practice in GNOME.  Or am I wrong?
> Seriously, then I want ebuilds provided for every package too.
> Nah, just kidding. Personally I don't think this is a good idea, as it
> would give one distribution a "higher" state than others, which is not
> what we want (I guess?)

We want more testing. If that means accepting that some distros are
used more than others, then so be it.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]