El mar, 18-01-2005 a las 20:52 +0100, Danilo Šegan escribió: > Today at 19:33, Damien Sandras wrote: > > > The only problem with 1.2.0 and GNOME 2.10 is with EDS, but I'm working > > on that. So, honnestly, I don't really understand the "problem" raised > > by Danilo. I'm respecting code freezes, string freezes, and the proposed > > version always works with the upcoming GNOME release. I thought that was > > enough. > > No, you're respecting all the freezes "illusionary". There're no code > changes or string changes simply because GnomeMeeting is already in a > stable release. You're not *benefiting* from code freezes and string > freezes, because they don't happen for GnomeMeeting as for the rest of > Gnome. So you are saying that if we have stable Gnomemeeting 2.3.1 we should release 2.3.2 with nothing added when GNOME 10 releases? Only for the shake of releasing? Please, don't CC me, as I am subscribed to enough lists to be able to read this. Cheers, -- Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo jsogo debian org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente