Re: Proposing module: PyGTK

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 14:17 +0100, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 13:32 +0100, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
> > [snip]
> > 
> >>Also, as a third party developer having Pygtk in the desktop would make 
> >>a difference to me when I was chosing language to use for my 
> >>application. Since I could then count on every GNOME desktop to have the 
> >>bindings, rather than having an extra dependency to bug users with...
> > 
> > [snip]
> > 
> > No, distros will ship what they want. They don't care whether we put a
> > library in our Desktop release set. They can only be forced to ship a
> > library if they really want an application that uses it.
> 
> If our desktop depends on it they don't really have a choice if they 
> want to ship GNOME.

Yes, if an important Desktop module depends on it, then they must ship
it. Regardless of whether it's in Desktop or Bindings.

-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com