Re: Proposing module: PyGTK
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: Mikael Hallendal <micke imendio com>
- Cc: Mark McLoughlin <markmc redhat com>, Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>, "desktop-devel-list gnome org" <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Proposing module: PyGTK
- Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 14:13:46 +0100
On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 13:32 +0100, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
[snip]
> Also, as a third party developer having Pygtk in the desktop would make
> a difference to me when I was chosing language to use for my
> application. Since I could then count on every GNOME desktop to have the
> bindings, rather than having an extra dependency to bug users with...
[snip]
No, distros will ship what they want. They don't care whether we put a
library in our Desktop release set. They can only be forced to ship a
library if they really want an application that uses it.
Bindings is a platform. We should encourage distros to ship platforms,
because most software is 3rd party software, and that needs a platform.
--
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]