El mié, 09-06-2004 a las 15:41, Sergey V. Udaltsov escribió: > > > :((( So do you offer me to build another abstract interface with single > > > XFree&Co implementation? No, thanks. BTW, IIRC this library does not > > > have proper public interface. Also, again IIRC this interface is very > > > ugly (probably because it is internal). At least that was my impression > > > when I looked at it. > > > > Then talk to the guys and, perhaps, make suggestions or a bit of code so > > it becomes an easier job. > Well, anything non-standard (even if it is nice and beautiful in X.Org > server) is nearly vetoed inside of me. As I said, I make all efforts to > be as server-agnostic as possible. Just think about users of VNC or > Exceed - which have nothing to do with XF86Config. Should they be able > to use gnome? That GST is unable to configure eXceed X server does not mean users cannot use gnome, it just means they'll probably get an "Unsupported =)" dialog box if they try to use the X GST tool. Other users which will get that kind of messagebox would be remote terminal users, evidently. Unless they give the root password perhaps. > > > We'll need to write a config backend to configure system-wide res and > > displays anyway, so while you're at it, input settings wouldn't be that > > hard. > I am at it?:) I am not a g-sys-tools guy, I am a keyboard guy:) As I > said, I do not see nice way (from both UI and architecture POV) to merge > g-s-t and g-k-p now. > > BTW, we should still remember about these poor people who do not have > xkb at all in their X servers - or, which is worse, have it broken. The > solution should be scalable to these situations as well. ... ? > > Sergey -- Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) GPG key ID: 0xC1033CAD at keyserver.net
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente