Proposed: Evolution (and associated libs)
- From: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
- To: GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Proposed: Evolution (and associated libs)
- Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 17:46:32 +1100
Evolution
---------
Although the inclusion of Evolution itself may be somewhat controversial, I
don't think there's much controversy over the inclusion of data-server and
the other modules (although now we have THREE html renderers in the Desktop
release, which is getting silly). Evo is fairly unstable right now, and is
obviously undergoing a lot of changes - will it be ready in time? The i18n
team has raised some issues about the number of strings and lack of
translator attention so far - will this significantly impact supported langs
for 2.6? Would it make sense to get the infrastructure into the Desktop, see
Evolution's successful release "when it's ready", and come back to it for
inclusion in 2.8? Last but not least, what about all the controversy about
GNOME 'choosing' a mailer (and groupware suite)? Would it make sense to have
the application outside the Desktop permanently? (My personal view on these
issues is that Evo should be in the Desktop, and we should focus on deep
integration through it and e-d-s and so on, but I know various people have
strongly differing views.)
Modules involved: evolution, evolution-data-server, gal, gtkhtml, libsoup
Further discusson goes HERE! :-)
- Jeff (not wearing his release team hat)
--
Come to gnome.conf.au 2004! http://www.gnome.org/~jdub/2004/gnome.conf.au/
"I love 2001. Especially the beginning with the proto-humans screaming
at each other and beating each other to death with rocks and bones.
That very neatly encapsulates my whole concept of interpersonal
relationships." - Branden Robinson
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]