Re: Proposal: gnome-user-share
- From: Trent Lloyd <lathiat bur st>
- To: Shaun McCance <shaunm gnome org>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: Proposal: gnome-user-share
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 21:30:32 +0800
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 05:52:07PM -0600, Shaun McCance wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 16:44, Peter Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 16:00 -0600, Shaun McCance wrote:
> > > The one thing that scares me about this is the possibility of filling up
> > > the hard drive with files a user can't see. I decide I hate everything
> > > I've been writing and delete my ~/Documents folder, which is actually a
> > > symlink to ~/.Documents, though I don't know that. The link is deleted,
> > > but the dot directory is still there, eating up drive space with files I
> > > thought I'd deleted.
> > >
> > > Of course, it's not an insurmountable problem. Some special-casing of
> > > deletion in Nautilus would do the trick. But it's something we should
> > > keep in mind if we go this route.
> >
> > Is it even that much of a problem? Probably the only users who are going
> > to delete Documents/Pictures/Downloads are the ones who never use them
> > anyway, so there won't be a lot of big files remaining hidden.
>
> Not the biggest problem in the world, but it's one worth considering,
> particularly considering how simple the solution would be. Imagine a
> user who decides the time is finally ripe to rerip all his music in Ogg
> Vorbis. He deletes ~/Music and gets ripping.
>
> And ~/Downloads is, by nature, temporary storage. I could easily see a
> user downloading a 600MB ISO, burning it, and then deleting ~/Downloads.
>
> > And, as always, disk space is cheap.
>
> No, it really isn't. "Disk space is cheap" is a fine excuse for not
> compressing every data file, or for having persistent caches. It's not
> a good excuse to leave files around that the user can't reasonably find
> and delete. That's like saying memory leaks are fine, because RAM is
> cheap.
>
> My ~/Music folder has over 100GB of data. That is not the kind of disk
> space I want to just lose because "disk space is cheap".
Whats wrong with hard links?
Cheers,
Trent
Bur.st
--
Trent Lloyd <lathiat bur st>
Bur.st Networking Inc.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]