Re: new modules consensus
- From: Mark McLoughlin <markmc redhat com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: Desktop Devel <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- Subject: Re: new modules consensus
- Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 14:16:23 +0100
Hi Havoc,
On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 03:59, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Of course, we could simply not include gnome-system-tools in Red Hat, so
> if people don't agree with the basic premises here that's fine. I'm just
> trying to share the conclusions we've reached because I do think they
> apply to GNOME upstream as well.
Curious as to what you think about Murray's point - that including
gnome-system-tools as it is now in GNOME 2.8 is progress enough that its
worth doing - agree/disagree?
Cheers,
Mark.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]