Re: Discussing module proposals (was Re: Request for GNOME2.8 inclusion: Cantus 3)



On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 17:11 +0200, Danilo Segan wrote:
> Today at 14:08, Andrew Sobala wrote:
> 
> ...
> > overriding quality/a10n/i18n issues, the release team has the job of
>                      ^^^^
> Are you thinking here of accessibilin or aocalization? ;-)
> 

ummmm... I'm sure it used to be a10y in bugzilla, once upon a time :)

> > But please don't stay out of module threads because "it's not my call" -
> > it is. Very much so.
> 
> My impression was that Christophe was only putting that as an aside,
> to let the proposer know that his words are not a final decision.
> I find that a nice and polite way to let the "outsiders" (like Samuel
> might be in a way) know that we're currently representing ourselves,
> and not the community at large.  This sometimes tends to be
> non-obvious, especially when we're using our soooh-kuhl @gnome.org
> aliases. :-)
> 
> It certainly didn't stop him from participating in a thread ;-)

Sure. It was related to something I was thinking about yesterday which
made me send the email - not specifically to him, but to anyone who
might feel they didn't want to participate in such threads.

-- 
Andrew Sobala <aes gnome org>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]